Section 179 Tax Deduction Calculator (2016)
Calculate your potential tax savings under Section 179 for the 2016 tax year. Enter your equipment details below.
Comprehensive Guide to Section 179 Deduction for 2016: Real-World Examples and Calculations
The Section 179 deduction has been one of the most valuable tax incentives for small and medium-sized businesses since its introduction. For the 2016 tax year, this provision allowed businesses to deduct the full purchase price of qualifying equipment and software purchased or financed during the tax year, rather than depreciating it over several years. This guide will explore the specifics of the Section 179 deduction for 2016, provide real-world examples, and help you understand how to maximize your tax savings.
What Was Section 179 in 2016?
For the 2016 tax year, Section 179 of the IRS tax code allowed businesses to:
- Deduct up to $500,000 of qualifying equipment and software purchased or leased during the tax year
- Apply the deduction to both new and used equipment (as long as it was new to your business)
- Take the deduction for equipment purchased, financed, or leased (with some restrictions on leases)
- Combine with 50% bonus depreciation for additional savings on qualifying property
The deduction began to phase out dollar-for-dollar when total equipment purchases exceeded $2,010,000, completely eliminating the deduction for purchases over $2,510,000.
Key 2016 Section 179 Limits
- Maximum Deduction: $500,000
- Phase-out Threshold: $2,010,000
- Bonus Depreciation: 50% (for qualifying property)
- Qualifying Property: Tangible personal property used in business (equipment, vehicles, computers, software, etc.)
Who Qualified for Section 179 in 2016?
To qualify for the Section 179 deduction in 2016, businesses had to meet these criteria:
- Business Use Requirement: The equipment must be used for business purposes more than 50% of the time
- Placed in Service: The equipment must have been placed in service (ready and available for use) during the 2016 tax year
- Acquisition Method: The equipment could be purchased, financed, or leased (with some restrictions on leases)
- Taxable Income Limit: The deduction couldn’t exceed the business’s taxable income (though unused amounts could sometimes be carried forward)
Both C corporations and pass-through entities (S corporations, partnerships, LLCs, and sole proprietorships) could take advantage of Section 179, though the application differed slightly for each entity type.
Real-World Section 179 Examples for 2016
Let’s examine several practical examples to illustrate how Section 179 worked in 2016:
Example 1: Small Business Equipment Purchase
Scenario: A landscaping business purchased a new $45,000 skid-steer loader in July 2016. The business had $180,000 in taxable income for the year and was in the 25% tax bracket.
| Item | Amount | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment Cost | $45,000 | Full purchase price of skid-steer loader |
| Section 179 Deduction | $45,000 | Full amount deductible (under $500,000 limit) |
| Tax Savings | $11,250 | $45,000 × 25% tax rate |
| Net Cost After Tax Savings | $33,750 | $45,000 – $11,250 tax savings |
Result: The business saved $11,250 in taxes, reducing the effective cost of the equipment to $33,750.
Example 2: Combining Section 179 with Bonus Depreciation
Scenario: A manufacturing company purchased $300,000 worth of new machinery in December 2016. The equipment qualified for both Section 179 and bonus depreciation. The company had $500,000 in taxable income and was in the 34% tax bracket.
| Item | Amount | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment Cost | $300,000 | Total purchase price of machinery |
| Section 179 Deduction | $250,000 | Portion taken as Section 179 (could have taken full $300,000) |
| Bonus Depreciation (50%) | $25,000 | 50% of remaining $50,000 ($300,000 – $250,000) |
| Regular Depreciation | $25,000 | Remaining amount depreciated normally |
| Total First-Year Deduction | $300,000 | $250,000 + $25,000 + $25,000 |
| Tax Savings | $102,000 | $300,000 × 34% tax rate |
Result: The company was able to deduct the entire $300,000 in the first year, saving $102,000 in taxes.
Example 3: Phase-Out Calculation
Scenario: A construction company purchased $2,200,000 worth of heavy equipment in 2016. The business had $1,000,000 in taxable income.
| Item | Amount | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Total Equipment Purchased | $2,200,000 | Exceeds phase-out threshold |
| Phase-Out Threshold | $2,010,000 | Maximum before reduction begins |
| Excess Amount | $190,000 | $2,200,000 – $2,010,000 |
| Reduced Section 179 Limit | $310,000 | $500,000 – $190,000 |
| Actual Deduction | $310,000 | Limited by reduced amount |
Result: Due to the phase-out rules, the company could only deduct $310,000 under Section 179 rather than the full $500,000 limit.
Qualifying Property for Section 179 in 2016
In 2016, Section 179 could be applied to a wide range of business property, including:
Tangible Personal Property
- Machinery and equipment
- Computers and peripherals
- Office furniture and fixtures
- Business vehicles (with weight restrictions)
- Manufacturing equipment
- Restaurant equipment
- Medical equipment
Off-the-Shelf Computer Software
- Accounting software
- Design software
- Productivity suites
- Industry-specific software
- Operating systems
Qualified Real Property (with limitations)
- HVAC systems
- Roofs
- Fire protection systems
- Security systems
- Storage facilities
Important Exclusions
The following did not qualify for Section 179 in 2016:
- Real estate (land and buildings, except for certain improvements)
- Property used outside the U.S.
- Property used to furnish lodging
- Air conditioning or heating units (unless part of a larger qualifying system)
- Property acquired from a related party
How to Claim Section 179 on Your 2016 Tax Return
To claim the Section 179 deduction for 2016, businesses needed to:
- Complete IRS Form 4562: This form is used to report depreciation and amortization, including the Section 179 deduction.
- Provide Detailed Records: Maintain purchase documents, invoices, and proof of placement in service.
- Calculate the Deduction: Determine the maximum allowable deduction based on income and phase-out rules.
- Attach to Tax Return: Include Form 4562 with your business tax return (Form 1040 for sole proprietors, Form 1065 for partnerships, Form 1120 for corporations, etc.).
- Consider State Rules: Some states didn’t conform to the federal Section 179 rules, so state tax treatment might have differed.
For partnerships and S corporations, the Section 179 deduction passed through to individual partners or shareholders, who then claimed it on their personal tax returns.
Section 179 vs. Bonus Depreciation in 2016
While both Section 179 and bonus depreciation offered accelerated depreciation benefits in 2016, there were key differences:
| Feature | Section 179 | Bonus Depreciation (2016) |
|---|---|---|
| Deduction Limit | $500,000 (phases out) | No limit (50% of cost) |
| Income Limitation | Cannot exceed taxable income | No income limitation |
| Property Type | New or used (must be new to you) | Generally new property only |
| Depreciable Life | Must have depreciable life > 1 year | Must have MACRS recovery period ≤ 20 years |
| Carryforward | Unused amounts can sometimes be carried forward | No carryforward |
| State Conformity | Varies by state | Varies by state |
In many cases, businesses could combine both Section 179 and bonus depreciation for maximum tax savings, as demonstrated in Example 2 above.
Common Mistakes to Avoid with Section 179 (2016)
When claiming Section 179 in 2016, businesses often made these errors:
- Missing the Placed-in-Service Deadline: Equipment had to be placed in service by December 31, 2016, to qualify. Many businesses missed this by delivering equipment in early 2017.
- Incorrectly Calculating Phase-Outs: Failing to account for the dollar-for-dollar phase-out when purchases exceeded $2,010,000.
- Mixing Personal and Business Use: Not properly tracking business use percentage (must be >50% for full deduction).
- Overlooking State Rules: Assuming state tax treatment matched federal rules without verification.
- Improper Documentation: Not maintaining adequate records to support the deduction in case of audit.
- Forgetting About Bonus Depreciation: Not taking advantage of the additional 50% bonus depreciation when applicable.
- Incorrect Form Filing: Failing to properly complete Form 4562 or attaching it to the wrong tax return.
Strategic Planning for Section 179 in 2016
Savvy business owners used these strategies to maximize their Section 179 benefits:
- Timing Purchases: Accelerating equipment purchases to place them in service before year-end.
- Leasing Considerations: Evaluating whether purchasing or leasing provided better tax benefits.
- Income Management: Coordinating equipment purchases with expected income to maximize deductions.
- Combining Deductions: Strategically using both Section 179 and bonus depreciation.
- State Planning: Considering state tax implications when making purchase decisions.
- Used Equipment: Taking advantage of the ability to deduct used equipment purchases.
- Software Purchases: Including qualifying software in Section 179 calculations.
Section 179 and Vehicle Purchases in 2016
Vehicles presented special considerations for Section 179 in 2016:
Passenger Vehicles
- Limited to $11,160 for cars
- $11,560 for trucks and vans
- Subject to additional limits if used <100% for business
Heavy SUVs (Over 6,000 lbs GVW)
- Could qualify for full Section 179 deduction
- Popular models: Chevrolet Tahoe, Ford Expedition
- Must be used >50% for business
Specialty Vehicles
- Cargo vans (e.g., Ford Transit) often qualified fully
- Pickup trucks with bed length >6 ft often qualified
- Vehicles with seating behind driver’s seat often didn’t qualify
For example, a business purchasing a $60,000 heavy SUV in 2016 could potentially deduct the full $60,000 under Section 179 if used 100% for business, while a $60,000 luxury sedan would be limited to $11,160.
Section 179 for Different Business Structures in 2016
The application of Section 179 varied by business entity type:
| Business Type | Section 179 Treatment | Special Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Sole Proprietorship | Claimed on Schedule C | Subject to owner’s taxable income limit |
| Partnership | Passed through to partners | Each partner’s share limited by their taxable income |
| S Corporation | Passed through to shareholders | Shareholders’ basis must accommodate the deduction |
| C Corporation | Claimed at corporate level | Could create net operating losses if income insufficient |
| LLC (Single Member) | Treated as sole proprietorship | Reported on Schedule C |
| LLC (Multi-Member) | Treated as partnership | Deduction allocated according to operating agreement |
Documentation Requirements for 2016 Section 179 Claims
Proper documentation was crucial for substantiating Section 179 deductions. The IRS expected businesses to maintain:
- Purchase Documents: Invoices, bills of sale, or lease agreements
- Proof of Payment: Cancelled checks, credit card statements, or loan documents
- Placement in Service Date: Delivery records, installation dates, or first-use documentation
- Business Use Percentage: Mileage logs for vehicles or usage records for equipment
- Depreciation Records: Previous years’ tax returns showing depreciation taken
- Manufacturer Specifications: For vehicles, documentation of gross vehicle weight rating
In the event of an audit, the IRS would typically request:
- Form 4562 from the tax return
- Equipment purchase agreements
- Proof of payment
- Documentation showing when the equipment was placed in service
- Records demonstrating business use percentage
Section 179 and State Taxes in 2016
State treatment of Section 179 varied significantly in 2016. Some states:
- Fully Conformed: Automatically adopted federal Section 179 rules (e.g., Texas, Florida)
- Partially Conformed: Adopted federal rules but with different limits (e.g., California)
- Decoupled: Didn’t recognize Section 179 at all (e.g., some states required normal depreciation)
- Addback Requirements: Required adding back the federal deduction then claiming state-specific depreciation
For example, California in 2016:
- Didn’t conform to federal Section 179
- Required businesses to add back the federal deduction
- Allowed normal MACRS depreciation for state purposes
- Had its own modified Section 179 rules with lower limits
- Track equipment location and use by state
- Calculate separate depreciation schedules for each state
- Consider state-specific phase-out rules
- Consult with a tax professional familiar with multi-state taxation
- It was not custom-designed
- It was available to the general public
- It was subject to a non-exclusive license
- It had a determinable useful life
- It was used for business >50% of the time
- Operating systems (Windows, macOS)
- Productivity suites (Microsoft Office, Adobe Creative Cloud)
- Accounting software (QuickBooks, Xero)
- Industry-specific software (CAD, medical billing, POS systems)
- Security software (antivirus, firewall)
- The entire cost could be deducted in the year placed in service
- Cloud-based software (SaaS) typically didn’t qualify unless purchased outright
- Custom-developed software didn’t qualify for Section 179
- Software bundled with hardware could be separated for deduction purposes
- Capital Leases: Treated as purchases, so they qualified for Section 179
- Operating Leases: Generally didn’t qualify (payments were deductible as operating expenses)
- Lease-Purchase Agreements: Often qualified if structured properly
- $1 Buyout Leases: Typically qualified as they were considered purchases
- The lessor (not lessee) usually claimed the deduction unless it was a capital lease
- Lease terms needed to be carefully reviewed to determine qualification
- True leases (where ownership didn’t transfer) didn’t qualify
- Lease payments for qualifying equipment could sometimes be deducted in full
- Section 179 deductions were not AMT preference items
- However, they could reduce regular taxable income, potentially triggering AMT
- Businesses needed to calculate both regular tax and AMT to determine optimal deduction amount
- In some cases, it was better to take less Section 179 to avoid AMT
- High-income individuals with significant deductions
- Businesses with large Section 179 deductions relative to income
- Taxpayers with other AMT preference items
- The home office qualified for the home office deduction
- The equipment was used >50% for business
- The equipment was used in the home office
- The home office was the principal place of business
- Computers and printers
- Office furniture (desks, chairs)
- Scanners and fax machines
- Business phones
- Specialized equipment for the business
- Personal use portion had to be tracked and excluded
- Equipment used both at home and in another office needed careful allocation
- Home office had to meet IRS requirements (regular and exclusive use)
- Equipment used in rental activities could qualify if:
- It was tangible personal property (not real estate)
- It was used in the rental business
- The rental activity was considered a “trade or business”
- Qualifying items included:
- Appliances in furnished rentals
- Lawn equipment for rental property maintenance
- Tools for rental property repairs
- Computers used for rental management
- Real property improvements generally didn’t qualify
- Passive activity loss rules could limit the deduction
- Rental income had to be sufficient to absorb the deduction
- Equipment had to be used primarily in the rental activity
- Qualifying Property:
- Livestock (breeding, dairy, or draft)
- Farm equipment and machinery
- Single-purpose agricultural structures
- Irrigation systems
- Grain bins and storage facilities
- Special Rules:
- Livestock could be expensed under Section 179
- Certain farm buildings qualified
- Equipment used for both farming and personal use needed careful allocation
- Income Averaging: Farmers could use income averaging to maximize Section 179 benefits
- Deduct the full $120,000 under Section 179 (if income allowed)
- Combine with 50% bonus depreciation if applicable
- Use the deduction to offset high-income years through income averaging
- Qualifying Equipment:
- Dental chairs and equipment
- Medical imaging machines
- Exam tables and cabinets
- Computer systems for patient records
- Sterilization equipment
- Special Considerations:
- Equipment had to be used >50% for business
- Leased equipment needed careful review
- Software for electronic health records often qualified
- Building improvements might qualify if properly structured
- Deduct the full $250,000 under Section 179
- Take additional 50% bonus depreciation on any remaining basis
- Use the deduction to offset high practice income
- Potentially create a net operating loss to carry forward
- Generally couldn’t claim Section 179 because they don’t pay income taxes
- Exceptions for:
- Unrelated business income activities
- Certain taxable subsidiaries
- Organizations with for-profit ventures
- Alternative options:
- Normal depreciation schedules
- State-specific incentives
- Grant funding for equipment purchases
- Benefits:
- Could deduct startup equipment costs immediately
- Helped reduce taxable income in early profitable years
- Improved cash flow by reducing tax payments
- Challenges:
- Limited by taxable income (common issue for startups)
- Unused deductions might be lost if business folded
- Complex interactions with other startup tax provisions
- Strategies:
- Time equipment purchases with expected income
- Consider combining with R&D tax credits
- Evaluate lease vs. purchase options carefully
- Consult with a startup-savvy tax professional
- R&D Credit Basics (2016):
- Credit of up to 20% of qualified research expenses
- Could offset both regular and AMT (for eligible small businesses)
- Could be carried forward for up to 20 years
- Combining with Section 179:
- Equipment used for R&D could qualify for Section 179
- Example: Lab equipment purchased for product development
- Could create significant tax savings when combined
- Considerations:
- Same property couldn’t be used for both Section 179 and R&D credit
- Need to allocate costs properly between the two incentives
- Complex calculations often required professional assistance
- Common Audit Triggers:
- Large deductions relative to income
- Equipment with potential personal use (especially vehicles)
- Lack of proper documentation
- Inconsistencies between reported income and deductions
- Claiming Section 179 for non-qualifying property
- IRS Focus Areas:
- Business use percentage (must be >50%)
- Placed-in-service dates
- Proper classification of property
- Correct application of phase-out rules
- Proper completion of Form 4562
- Audit Protection Strategies:
- Maintain contemporaneous records
- Document business use percentages
- Keep receipts and proof of payment
- Record placed-in-service dates
- Consult with a tax professional before filing
- Accelerate Purchases: Buy and place equipment in service before December 31
- Delay Income: Defer invoicing to reduce taxable income and maximize deduction
- Review State Rules: Consider state tax implications of year-end purchases
- Evaluate Lease Options: Determine if purchasing or leasing provided better tax benefits
- Coordinate with Other Deductions: Balance Section 179 with other year-end tax strategies
- Document Everything: Ensure all purchase and usage records are complete
- Consult a Tax Professional: Get expert advice on optimal year-end strategies
- Kitchen equipment (ovens, refrigerators)
- POS systems
- Furniture and decor
- Vehicles for catering
- Heavy equipment (excavators, bulldozers)
- Tools and power equipment
- Work trucks and vans
- Scaffolding and safety equipment
- Point-of-sale systems
- Store fixtures and displays
- Security systems
- Delivery vehicles
- Production machinery
- 3D printers
- Forklifts and material handlers
- Quality control equipment
- Servers and network equipment
- Development workstations
- Testing equipment
- Software licenses
- Medical imaging equipment
- Exam tables and cabinets
- Dental chairs
- Electronic health record systems
- Reduced taxable income might affect:
- ACA premium tax credit eligibility
- Employer shared responsibility payments
- Cadillac tax calculations (for high-value health plans)
- Equipment purchases might include:
- Healthcare IT systems for ACA compliance
- Wellness program equipment
- Medical equipment for on-site clinics
- Tax planning needed to coordinate:
- Section 179 deductions
- ACA-related tax provisions
- Other business deductions
- Qualifying Property:
- Energy-efficient HVAC systems
- Solar energy equipment
- Geothermal systems
- Energy-efficient lighting
- Building insulation
- Potential Benefits:
- Section 179 deduction for full cost
- Energy investment tax credits (where applicable)
- Utility rebates
- Reduced energy costs
- Considerations:
- Some energy property had special depreciation rules
- Need to coordinate with energy credit claims
- Documentation requirements were stricter
- Basic Rules:
- Section 179 deduction couldn’t create or increase an NOL
- Unused Section 179 amounts could sometimes be carried forward
- NOLs from other sources didn’t affect Section 179 eligibility
- Strategies:
- Time equipment purchases for profitable years
- Consider carrying forward unused Section 179 amounts
- Evaluate whether normal depreciation might be better
- Coordinate with NOL carryback/carryforward planning
- Special Cases:
- Farming businesses had different NOL rules
- Corporations could carry NOLs back 2 years, forward 20 years
- Pass-through entities passed NOLs to owners
- Key Points:
- Section 179 deductions reduced regular taxable income
- Could trigger AMT if regular tax was reduced significantly
- AMT calculations used different depreciation rules
- Some small businesses were exempt from AMT
- Planning Strategies:
- Calculate both regular tax and AMT liability
- Consider limiting Section 179 to avoid AMT
- Evaluate whether bonus depreciation might be better
- Consult with a tax professional familiar with AMT
- AMT Adjustments:
- Section 179 wasn’t an AMT preference item
- But could indirectly affect AMT by reducing regular tax
- AMT depreciation used longer recovery periods
- Basic Rules:
- Equipment had to be used in the U.S. to qualify
- Foreign-owned businesses could claim for U.S. operations
- U.S. businesses couldn’t claim for foreign equipment
- Complex Scenarios:
- Equipment used both in U.S. and abroad needed allocation
- Foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies had special rules
- Transfer pricing issues could arise
- Documentation Requirements:
- Clear records of equipment location and use
- Documentation of U.S. vs. foreign allocation
- Proof of U.S. business operations
- Key Considerations:
- Bankruptcy estate might be able to claim Section 179
- Deduction could be limited by bankruptcy rules
- Equipment purchases might require court approval
- Deduction might affect creditor payments
- Chapter-Specific Rules:
- Chapter 7: Generally couldn’t claim new deductions
- Chapter 11: Might claim with court approval
- Chapter 13: Limited to business-related debtors
- Professional Advice:
- Consult with bankruptcy attorney and tax professional
- Coordinate with bankruptcy trustee
- Consider impact on reorganization plan
- Basic Rules:
- Generally couldn’t claim Section 179
- Exceptions for businesses operated by estates/trusts
- Deduction limited to taxable income of the estate/trust
- Qualifying Scenarios:
- Equipment used in an active trade or business
- Farming operations owned by the estate/trust
- Rental activities that qualified as a business
- Special Considerations:
- Complex interactions with estate/trust tax rules
- Potential for double taxation issues
- Need to coordinate with fiduciary accounting
- General Rule: Couldn’t claim Section 179 as they don’t pay income taxes
- Exceptions:
- Unrelated business income activities
- Taxable subsidiaries
- Certain joint ventures with for-profit entities
- Alternative Options:
- Normal depreciation for book purposes
- State and local incentives
- Grant funding for equipment purchases
- WOTC Basics (2016):
- Credit for hiring employees from certain target groups
- Up to $9,600 per eligible employee
- Could offset both regular and AMT
- Combining with Section 179:
- Equipment purchases to support new hires
- Example: Buying computers for new WOTC-eligible employees
- Could create significant combined tax savings
- Considerations:
- WOTC had its own complex certification requirements
- Need to coordinate timing of hires and equipment purchases
- Potential for improved cash flow from combined credits/deductions
- NUBIG Basics:
- Occurs when C corporation converts to S corporation
- Built-in gains tax may apply when assets are sold
- Section 179 deductions could affect NUBIG calculations
- Section 179 Implications:
- Deductions reduced taxable income, potentially affecting NUBIG tax
- Equipment purchases might trigger built-in gains
- Complex interactions with basis limitations
- Planning Strategies:
- Coordinate Section 179 with NUBIG tax planning
- Consider timing of equipment purchases relative to built-in gain period
- Consult with a tax professional experienced in S corporation conversions
- Key Issues:
- U.S. tax treaty provisions might affect deductions
- Foreign owners’ U.S. tax filing requirements
- Potential for withholding tax issues
- Transfer pricing documentation requirements
- Special Rules:
- Equipment had to be used in U.S. trade or business
- Foreign owners might need to file U.S. tax returns
- Section 179 deductions could affect effectively connected income
- Documentation:
- Clear records of U.S. business operations
- Documentation of equipment use in U.S.
- Proof of foreign ownership structure
- Basic Interaction:
- Section 179 couldn’t be claimed on replacement property in a 1031 exchange
- But could be claimed on additional “boot” paid
- Could be claimed on property not part of the exchange
- Planning Opportunities:
- Structure exchanges to maximize Section 179 on non-exchange property
- Consider partial exchanges to create Section 179 opportunities
- Coordinate timing of exchanges and equipment purchases
- Documentation Requirements:
- Clear records of exchange vs. non-exchange property
- Documentation of boot payments
- Proof of placed-in-service dates
- Key Issues:
- Section 179 deduction generally claimed in year property placed in service
- But installment sales spread income recognition over time
- Could create mismatches between deductions and income
- Planning Strategies:
- Consider timing of equipment purchases relative to installment income
- Evaluate whether Section 179 or normal depreciation is better
- Coordinate with overall tax planning for installment sales
- Special Cases:
- Installment sales of equipment that was previously subject to Section 179
- Equipment purchased with installment sale proceeds
- Related-party installment sales
- Qualifying Property:
- Equipment used in inventory production often qualified
- Inventory itself didn’t qualify
- Storage systems for inventory might qualify
- Special Rules:
- UNICAP rules might affect deduction timing
- Inventory accounting methods could interact with Section 179
- Equipment used for inventory management often qualified
- Planning Opportunities:
- Time equipment purchases with inventory cycles
- Consider impact on cost of goods sold calculations
- Coordinate with inventory accounting methods
- Potential Synergies:
- Equipment used for R&D could qualify for Section 179
- Example: Lab equipment for product development
- Could combine immediate deduction with research credits
- Key Considerations:
- Same property couldn’t be used for both Section 179 and research credit
- Need to allocate costs properly between the incentives
- Research credit had its own complex calculation rules
- Documentation Requirements:
- Clear records of equipment use in R&D activities
- Documentation supporting research credit claims
- Time tracking for equipment used in multiple activities
- Key Issues:
- Section 179 reduced U.S. taxable income
- Could affect foreign tax credit limitation calculations
- Might create or increase excess foreign tax credits
- Planning Strategies:
- Coordinate Section 179 with foreign tax credit planning
- Consider timing of equipment purchases relative to foreign income
- Evaluate impact on overall foreign tax credit utilization
- Special Considerations:
- Equipment used in foreign operations didn’t qualify
- Foreign-source income affected credit limitations
- Complex interactions with foreign tax credit baskets
- Basic Interaction:
- Section 179 reduced taxable income, potentially reducing NIIT
- But equipment purchases might generate investment income
- Complex interactions with passive activity rules
- Planning Considerations:
- Evaluate impact on both income tax and NIIT
- Consider timing of equipment purchases relative to investment income
- Coordinate with overall NIIT planning strategies
- Special Cases:
- Equipment leased to related parties
- Passive rental activities with equipment purchases
- Investment property with business equipment
- Key Points:
- Section 179 reduced net income from self-employment
- Could reduce self-employment tax (15.3%)
- But equipment purchases might be subject to self-employment tax if business-related
- Planning Strategies:
- Calculate combined impact on income tax and self-employment tax
- Consider timing of equipment purchases relative to self-employment income
- Evaluate whether S corporation election might be beneficial
- Special Considerations:
- Equipment used in multiple businesses needed proper allocation
- Home office equipment had special rules
- State self-employment tax rules might differ
State Tax Planning Tip
Businesses operating in multiple states needed to:
Section 179 for Software in 2016
In 2016, “off-the-shelf” computer software qualified for Section 179 if:
Qualifying software included:
Important notes about software:
Section 179 for Leased Equipment in 2016
Leased equipment could qualify for Section 179 in 2016 under specific conditions:
Key considerations for leased equipment:
Section 179 and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) in 2016
For 2016, Section 179 deductions could affect AMT calculations:
AMT considerations were particularly important for:
Section 179 for Home Offices in 2016
Equipment used in home offices could qualify for Section 179 if:
Examples of qualifying home office equipment:
Important notes:
Section 179 for Rental Property Owners in 2016
Rental property owners had limited Section 179 opportunities in 2016:
Special considerations:
Section 179 for Farmers and Agricultural Businesses in 2016
Farmers and agricultural businesses had unique Section 179 opportunities:
Example: A farmer purchasing a $120,000 tractor in 2016 could:
Section 179 for Medical and Dental Practices in 2016
Medical and dental practices could benefit significantly from Section 179:
Example: A dental practice purchasing $250,000 of new equipment in 2016 could:
Section 179 for Nonprofit Organizations in 2016
Nonprofit organizations had limited Section 179 opportunities:
Section 179 for Startups in 2016
Startups faced unique challenges and opportunities with Section 179:
Section 179 and the Research & Development Tax Credit in 2016
Businesses could potentially combine Section 179 with the R&D tax credit:
Section 179 Audit Risks and IRS Scrutiny in 2016
The IRS closely examined Section 179 deductions in 2016, particularly:
Section 179 Planning for Year-End 2016
As 2016 drew to a close, businesses employed these year-end strategies:
Section 179 vs. Normal Depreciation: A Comparison
Comparing Section 179 to normal depreciation methods:
| Feature | Section 179 (2016) | MACRS Depreciation | Bonus Depreciation (2016) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deduction Timing | Full deduction in year placed in service | Spread over asset’s useful life | 50% in first year, remainder depreciated |
| Deduction Limit | $500,000 (phases out) | No limit | No limit (50% of cost) |
| Income Limitation | Cannot exceed taxable income | No income limitation | No income limitation |
| Property Type | New or used tangible personal property | Most business property | Generally new property only |
| Tax Savings Timing | Immediate | Spread over several years | Mostly immediate (50% in first year) |
| Complexity | Moderate (phase-out calculations) | High (multiple depreciation schedules) | Moderate |
| Best For | Small businesses with immediate taxable income | Large purchases spread over time | Businesses purchasing new equipment |
Section 179 for Specific Industries in 2016
Restaurant Industry
Construction
Retail
Manufacturing
Technology
Healthcare
Section 179 and the Affordable Care Act in 2016
While not directly related, Section 179 deductions could interact with ACA provisions:
Section 179 for Energy-Efficient Equipment in 2016
Some energy-efficient equipment qualified for both Section 179 and energy credits:
Section 179 for Businesses with Net Operating Losses (NOLs)
Businesses with NOLs faced special Section 179 considerations:
Section 179 for Businesses with Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)
AMT considerations for Section 179 in 2016:
Section 179 for Businesses with Foreign Operations
Special rules applied to businesses with foreign operations:
Section 179 for Businesses in Bankruptcy
Businesses in bankruptcy faced special Section 179 issues:
Section 179 for Estates and Trusts
Estates and trusts had limited Section 179 opportunities:
Section 179 for Tax-Exempt Organizations
Tax-exempt organizations had limited Section 179 opportunities:
Section 179 and the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC)
Businesses could potentially combine Section 179 with WOTC:
Section 179 for Businesses with Net Unrealized Built-in Gains (NUBIG)
Businesses with NUBIG (typically S corporations) faced special rules:
Section 179 for Businesses with Foreign Owners
Businesses with foreign owners faced additional Section 179 considerations:
Section 179 for Businesses in Like-Kind Exchanges
Section 179 interacted with like-kind exchanges (Section 1031) in complex ways:
Section 179 for Businesses with Installment Sales
Businesses using installment sales had special Section 179 considerations:
Section 179 for Businesses with Inventory
Businesses with inventory had these Section 179 considerations:
Section 179 for Businesses with Research Credits
Businesses claiming research credits had these Section 179 interactions:
Section 179 for Businesses with Foreign Tax Credits
Businesses claiming foreign tax credits had these Section 179 interactions:
Section 179 for Businesses with Net Investment Income Tax
Section 179 could interact with the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT):
Section 179 for Businesses with Self-Employment Tax
Section 179 affected self-employment tax calculations: